Bloggers are random losers who don’t get published.
That’s exactly what my Journalism teacher told the entire class one day. Amidst no retorts and no “you better have a good reason for saying this”, her statement stood like a wall of fact. But was it really?
Recently, a lot of questions and speculations have come up about how print media is dying and while, I’m one of those who firmly believe it not to be so, in my opinion I think it has led to many print media professionals feeling a bit threatened about our increasing reliance on the world wide web for information and the number of opportunities it has opened up for “non-journalists” to act/feel like they are in actuality, journalists.
It’s almost like how you’d react to a new co-worker who is just younger and better.
However, is there any cause for jealousy?
I think not. For one, I don’t think the social media “intends” to replace the print industry. Even though, more and more people are now relying on Twitter and their Facebook newsfeeds for such thing as weather updates, traffic blockages and new laws and regulations, a considerable number of people still continue to browse through newspapers to acquaint themselves with a particular style of reporting or let’s just say for a “more authentic” feel anyway.
One of the most oft quoted accusation against blogging has been about how it’s unedited and relies heavily upon the judgement or the intelligence of the person writing. While that’s mostly true, the fact that internet is accessible to everyone – blogger or not, sort of arms the readers with the ability to cross-check and make sure for themselves about whether what they are reading is just baseless or holds some weight.
Also, the fact that a number of people can comment right underneath the blog increases the chances of the reader getting a more unbiased perspective than we think he is getting since he is privy to multiple opinions on the subject – something he normally can’t achieve during a news report on TV or on print.
Besides, with blogging you do have a certain amount of freedom. There are no deadlines, only the need to be relevant at the time of writing. There are no word count limitations or even editorial pressure to present or not present a certain perspective, depending upon the institutional pressures a publication is exposed to.
While that is frowned upon by hardcore journalists, a number of newspapers like The News, Dawn.com and The Express Tribune have taken the decision to publish blogs on their websites. They certainly aren’t put up unedited and unchecked. They go through a certain procedure, checked for authenticity and facts before they are put up.
While some of the factions all over the world continue to look down upon or don’t seriously take the implications of social media on readership habits, it’s true that with time, they are changing. Even though I’m an avid reader and a fan of the classic, I wouldn’t raise a hue and cry about reading a newspaper on an e-tablet.